From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Tue Jul 22 05:42:00 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs24349-133.austin.rr.com
	([24.243.49.133] helo=cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19ewSn-0007jC-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:41:53 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6MCqHxN065852
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:52:17 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h6MCqGns065851
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:52:16 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 07:52:16 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: le du
Message-ID: <20030722125216.GA65784@allusion.net>
References: <20030721180838.U72693-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> <00df01c34fd9$2cf11340$55350751@oemcomputer> <20030722005320.GA61835@allusion.net> <3F1CE8E8.5050000@bilkent.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F1CE8E8.5050000@bilkent.edu.tr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-archive-position: 5951
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:34:00AM +0300, Robin Turner wrote:
> Jordan DeLong wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:41:02PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
[...]
> >>le du cu frili
> >>
> >>-- where "le du" might here refer to the act of giving an example text =
in
> >>Lojban.
> >
> >
> >How does {le du} (something like the thing which I describe as being
> >equal to some thing(s) (which are obviously itself, because they
> >are equal to it...)) differ from {le co'e}?
> >
> >(That is, aside from being more esoteric).
> >
> >It seems to me like they are the same, except that {le co'e} is
> >more "honest" (for lack of a better word).
> >
> >Of course, in *real* usage, in a case where the referent wasn't
> >recently mentioned, you'd probably say "zo'e".  (If it were mentioned,
> >you'd use zo'e or ri/ra/ru/lerfu).
> >
> I can't see the point in using zo'e in the first place - if it's=20
> obvious, leave it blank.

Leaving it blank counts as using zo'e.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/HTOADrrilS51AZ8RAq+wAJ99hVJB6O3sKKow1mY0bN+FHongggCfR+wM
YnXzXm6UncuUqGDHyMU9e0A=
=t9sl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--