From jcowan@reutershealth.com Thu Jul 17 13:58:10 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 12164 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 20:58:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jul 2003 20:58:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.36) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 20:58:09 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (mail [65.246.141.36]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA00024; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:54:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:56:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:56:45 -0400 To: Invent Yourself Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Some questions Message-ID: <20030717205645.GE24731@skunk.reutershealth.com> References: <3F1708E5.1000303@bilkent.edu.tr> <20030717164534.K65753-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030717164534.K65753-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20382 Invent Yourself scripsit: > Somehow I think ".e" is not the most useful interpretation that could be > given such overloading. What do you suggest? -- Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out. --Arthur C. Clarke, "The Nine Billion Names of God" John Cowan