From araizen@newmail.net Mon Jul 21 10:11:48 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 10368 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 17:11:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Jul 2003 17:11:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 17:11:46 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19eeCQ-0003iL-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:46 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19eeCJ-0003hW-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:39 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxout4.netvision.net.il ([194.90.9.27]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19eeCA-0003hM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:30 -0700 Received: from default ([62.0.115.147]) by mxout4.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with SMTP id <0HID0011RX31CW@mxout4.netvision.net.il> for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:11:27 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:12:27 +0200 Subject: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a To: "lojban-list@lojban.org" Message-id: <0HID0011SX32CW@mxout4.netvision.net.il> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [eg] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5939 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: araizen@newmail.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Adam Raizen Reply-To: araizen@newmail.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=3063669 X-Yahoo-Profile: araizen X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20421 de'i li 2003-07-21 ti'u li 17:01:00 la'o zoi. And Rosta .zoi cusku di'e >{zo'e} generalizes over all sumti, including quantified variables and zi'o; >it is not restricted to specific referents. Haven't we agreed that zo'e can't be zi'o? Allowing it to be zi'o would have very significant semantic effects. mu'o mi'e .adam.