From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Jul 11 14:32:29 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 44067 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 21:32:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Jul 2003 21:32:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2003 21:32:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19b5VE-0001a8-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:32:28 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19b5V7-0001Zo-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:32:21 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.112]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19b5Uw-0001Zd-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:32:10 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-142.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.142]) by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9275B697 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:31:37 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <004101c347f3$cf0a7560$02e1fea9@oemcomputer> To: References: <5739b570a3.570a35739b@imap.epfl.ch> Subject: [lojban] Re: Emily Dickinson Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:23:57 +0100 Organization: Livagian Consulate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 5873 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20354 greg: > > > > se xabju lo flira na mulno > > > > se viska lo trina poi ka'e > > > > gi le firjulne gi ke'a se vimcu > > > > le du noi se mu'i gi ke'a > > > > > > > ge catlu co bumru gi djica > > > > je narcru gi no da co'udji > > > > gi'e pu bo ganse lo poi'i da ke'a > > > > se xanri je mansa ra'idji > > Does that na parse? I believe so. > isn't lo brode na broda == lo brode cu na broda == naku lo brode cu > broda? No, unless as is very possible, I have misread the grammar. --And.