From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Mon Jul 21 06:45:31 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 21577 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 13:45:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Jul 2003 13:45:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 13:45:30 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19eayo-0004Y8-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:45:30 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19eayg-0004Xn-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:45:22 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.112])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19eayX-0004XX-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 06:45:13 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-63-157.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.63.157])
	by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2FE5B693
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:44:40 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <006801c34f8e$3fc2fec0$55350751@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <0HID0000CLTCWA@mxout4.netvision.net.il> <20030721134231.GA57104@allusion.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:44:31 +0100
Organization: Livagian Consulate
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-archive-position: 5932
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20414

Jordan to Adam:
> > The argument is that it is grammatical, it has an obvious meaning, 
> > and it is useful. Not every sumti place has to be
>
> But I reject that it is useful, since you can get the same use with
> less syllables using existing anaphora.

Translate English "They went." I can see two ways:

1. ko'a klama
2. le du cu klama

Neither uses anaphora, and I cannot see any way of using anaphora.

--And.