From xod@thestonecutters.net Wed Jul 23 08:42:54 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 42863 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 15:42:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jul 2003 15:42:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2003 15:42:54 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19fLlV-0006K0-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:42:53 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19fLlA-0006J4-00; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:42:32 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19fLkt-0006Gr-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:42:15 -0700
Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1])
	by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6NFcGVH035391
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
Received: from localhost (xod@localhost)
	by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h6NFcGS0035388
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: le du
In-Reply-To: <20030723145748.80400.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20030723113612.J33722-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-archive-position: 5966
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20448

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Jorge Llambías wrote:

>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > I haven't yet seen a good reason to use le du.
>
> There is no reason not to use it. It has a clear meaning
> determined by the meanings of {le} and {du}. You don't have to
> use it if you don't want to, there usually are alternatives,
> but it is well defined. It is a matter of style which
> alternative you prefer. {du} is the emptiest possible
> description you can get, as it applies to everything.
> {le du} is equivalent to {le su'o da}.


le du means le du zo'e, not le du da, right?

le du is null. It's overly verbose, but I can't justify the rejection of
senseless verbosity on any grounds other than style.



-- 
The Pentagon group believed it had a visionary strategy that would
transform Iraq into an ally of Israel, remove a potential threat to the
Persian Gulf oil trade and encircle Iran with U.S. friends and allies...