From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sat Jul 12 05:30:20 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 79593 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2003 12:30:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Jul 2003 12:30:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2003 12:30:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19bJW8-0004Uv-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:30:20 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19bJVS-0004KR-00; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:29:38 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.113]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19bJVI-0004KI-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 05:29:28 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-62-31.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.62.31]) by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D2F3CF28 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:28:55 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <008101c34871$29976d80$02e1fea9@oemcomputer> To: References: <20030711230123.84789.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Emily Dickinson Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 11:03:54 +0100 Organization: Livagian Consulate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 5875 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20356 xorxes: > --- And Rosta wrote: > > greg: > > > isn't lo brode na broda == lo brode cu na broda == naku lo brode cu > > > broda? > > > > No, unless as is very possible, I have misread the grammar. > > I'm afraid you have misread it. {na} can only appear in front > of the whole selbri, possibly mixed with tags. It can't appear > inside of a tanru. That's what the yacc seems to say, but I wonder therefore whether EBNF "selbri-1 = selbri-2 NA # selbri" (Woldy, 554) is a typo for "selbri-1 = selbri-2 | NA # selbri". --And.