From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Jul 11 11:49:26 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 73964 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2003 18:49:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Jul 2003 18:49:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2003 18:49:10 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19b2xC-0004L6-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:49:10 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19b2x4-0004Km-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:49:02 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.112])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19b2ws-0004KV-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:48:50 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-62-11.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.62.11])
	by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1744E5B6AE
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 20:48:18 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <002801c347dc$fe201b00$02e1fea9@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <20030711174509.77537.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: "Game", "Player"
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:43:47 +0100
Organization: Livagian Consulate
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-archive-position: 5865
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20346

xorxes:
> With {ka'e} you make a statement of fact, not a rule. A rule has to
> allow or forbid something. 

Most or many linguists see language rules as like a game's rules, and
the majority of these linguists see language rules not as allowing or
forbidding but simply as defining (what counts as a sentence of the
language; what counts as a playing of the game).

So if you (implicitly) add to Craig's rules a clause "ro da go da is
an instance of this game gi" and then list all the rules (appropriately
connected by ANDs and ORs), then Craig's ka'e would be preferable to e'a.

--And.