From cowan@ccil.org Wed Jul 30 18:50:28 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 14739 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2003 01:50:27 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19i2aJ-0001OT-00; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:50:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:50:27 -0400 To: And Rosta Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: le duX Message-ID: <20030731015027.GB3024@mercury.ccil.org> References: <013501c356f0$e4f7f120$3f3d0751@oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <013501c356f0$e4f7f120$3f3d0751@oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=212516 X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20493 And Rosta scripsit: > I had assumed that co'e ranges across all possible relations, not across > all possible grammatical selbri. But I may be wrong; it may be that co'e > is indeed the counterpart of zo'e, in which case the question was wrongly > reposed. co'e was indeed intended as a counterpart of zo'e, but I don't understand your distinction between "all possible relations" and "all possible grammatical selbri", unless it is a matter of referent and reference. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin