From phma@webjockey.net Fri Aug 01 17:30:47 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 19728 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2003 00:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Aug 2003 00:30:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2003 00:30:46 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C4FDD2C01; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 00:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] ISO 639-2 request Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 20:30:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030530153358.GN4034@skunk.reutershealth.com> <200308011812.10272.phma@webjockey.net> <20030801235727.GC29819@mercury.ccil.org> In-Reply-To: <20030801235727.GC29819@mercury.ccil.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308012030.36070.phma@webjockey.net> From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20513 On Friday 01 August 2003 19:57, John Cowan wrote: > Pierre Abbat scripsit: > > Any news on the code "jbo" for Lojban? > > No, and I wouldn't hold your breath. I will hear about it if is > approved (disapproved requests either just vanish or there haven't > been any). According to the FAQ, "The original requester will be informed of the JAC decision in six weeks to two months from submission of the original request." If you haven't heard by now, I suggest you contact them and check whether they still have it. phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.