From sentto-44114-20665-1063560322-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sun Sep 14 10:26:01 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.72]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19yadF-0006cB-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:25:53 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-20665-1063560322-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Sep 2003 17:25:22 -0000 X-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 52802 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 17:25:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Sep 2003 17:25:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 17:25:21 -0000 Received: from craig [209.42.212.114] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A48433EC0060; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:25:24 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.212.114] From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:24:44 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: brivla se brivla Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 6161 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >what does it mean when se is place between brivla? se always converts the next brivla. >i thought it is not legal but the doc says otherwise. If i say > mi sutra klama do >with the use of se it would be > do se sutra klama mi No, actually. It would be do sutra se klama mi. se sutra klama parses as ((se sutra) klama) mi, and is thus a form of klamaing rather than of se klamaing. Now we just need somebody to rewrite that in words that make sense, because I probably didn't. -- .kreig.daniyl. "Maybe there ought to be a motion on having immortality investigated for Robin, so that he can serve as the secretary forever." -Jay Kominek ragnarok@pobox.com teucer@bnomic.org ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/