From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Sep 24 05:51:29 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 62047 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 12:51:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Sep 2003 12:51:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 12:51:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 1A297A-00039C-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:51:28 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A296s-00038X-00; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:51:10 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:51:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.111]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A296T-000322-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 05:50:45 -0700 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-250.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.250]) by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21F61E7A5 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:50:09 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <003901c3829a$658511e0$fa4279d5@oemcomputer> To: References: <20030923213205.GA7263@mit.edu> Subject: [lojban] Re: More Tiki problems Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:50:05 +0100 Organization: Livagian Consulate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-archive-position: 6280 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20762 Rob: > Oh, and it's slow as ass, too. I'm beginning to yearn for PHPWiki, at > least for the normal Wiki stuff. Perhaps the BPFK could use Tiki to replace > PHPBB and TWiki. Let's not be overhasty. The tiki looks very promising in terms of what it offers. And the last wiki had loads of teething problems initially. But Robin quickly sorted them out & thereafter it all worked fine.