From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 16 16:09:55 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 80738 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 23:09:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Sep 2003 23:09:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 23:09:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zOxF-0005G2-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:09:53 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zOvx-0005Dv-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:08:33 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zOvd-0005Da-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:08:13 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:08:13 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed. Message-ID: <20030916230813.GD26715@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030916190644.GY26715@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6188 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20670 On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:12:22PM -0400, Craig wrote: > >The BPFK (see http://www.lojban.org/llg/baseline.html) is trying > >to represent all parts of the Lojban community. > > >Its deliberations are currently at an impasse, largely because > >there are no active comissioners who are also true Baseline > >Conservatives (i.e. people who believe that the baseline should > >be absolutely inviolate). > > >Some such people stepping up to the plate would be a Very Good > >Thing. > > I take issue with this on two counts. I agree with your POV entirely. However, no-one else (in particular Bob, Nick, and Andrew) seem to, so I wast trying to help move things along. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui