From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 30 00:57:42 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 85971 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 07:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Sep 2003 07:57:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2003 07:57:41 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 1A4FO9-0005FJ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:57:41 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A4FNS-0005Em-00; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:56:58 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.188] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A4FNG-0005Ea-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:56:46 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8U7ugG0003944 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:56:42 +0200 (MEST) Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:56:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: Closings of letters Message-ID: <3F795359.9446.292396@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20030930010446.GA36778@allusion.net> References: <200309291803.34656.phma@webjockey.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 6320 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Philip Newton" From: "Philip Newton" Reply-To: pnewton@gmx.de X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20802 On 29 Sep 2003 at 20:04, Jordan DeLong wrote: > I'd just replace them all with "mu'omi'e". So would I. (Or co'omi'e, but mu'omi'e is indeed better, since you general expect a response to a letter.) mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.