From lojbab@lojban.org Tue Sep 16 17:39:53 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 91793 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 00:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2003 00:39:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 00:39:52 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zQMK-0007M2-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:39:52 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zQLQ-0007Kk-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:38:56 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao04.cox.net ([68.1.17.241]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zQL9-0007Js-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:38:39 -0700 Received: from bob.lojban.org ([68.100.92.1]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20030917003807.CMWI29227.lakemtao04.cox.net@bob.lojban.org> for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:38:07 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030916203035.030390b0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: lojbab@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:38:09 -0400 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed. In-Reply-To: <20030916235524.GI26715@digitalkingdom.org> References: <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> <001d01c37ca8$ca179940$103c0751@oemcomputer> <20030916232253.GF26715@digitalkingdom.org> <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-archive-position: 6195 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Bob LeChevalier Reply-To: lojbab@lojban.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20677 At 04:55 PM 9/16/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:35:00PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:22, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:18:02AM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > > > > then those resolutions would be rather conspicuously > > > > unconservative, it seems. I'd have thought that it would have > > > > been enough for Robin to ask for active commissioners with an > > > > avowed aversion to tinkering, > > > > > > That would be fine, yes. > > > > Well, I wouldn't say *avowed*, but I rather dislike tinkering, > > unless it's to clarify something which was a little muddy (gadri, > > for example). > >Bob, I hope you read that. How do you expect me to react to it? I'm pretty aware of the range of opinions among the commissioners. If there is an issue to be decided, then it needs to go to the Board. It isn't clear what people would want to be decided. Note that Nora and I will be contributing at most minimally to the byfy until the accounting turnover is complete, as was decided before the byfy started. That is one reason for my inactivity. The other, as probably is true for others in the community, is that I have not yet recovered from the stress levels associated with the annual meeting enough to even *want* to increase my Lojban activity level. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org