From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 16 16:56:45 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 98844 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 23:56:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Sep 2003 23:56:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 23:56:44 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zPgZ-0006S1-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:56:43 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zPfa-0006Pe-00; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:55:43 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19zPfI-0006Ox-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:55:24 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:55:24 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Conservative, *active* BPFK commissioners needed. Message-ID: <20030916235524.GI26715@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <001d01c37ca8$ca179940$103c0751@oemcomputer> <20030916232253.GF26715@digitalkingdom.org> <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1063755299.13448.40.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6194 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20676 On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:35:00PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:22, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:18:02AM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > > > then those resolutions would be rather conspicuously > > > unconservative, it seems. I'd have thought that it would have > > > been enough for Robin to ask for active commissioners with an > > > avowed aversion to tinkering, > > > > That would be fine, yes. > > Well, I wouldn't say *avowed*, but I rather dislike tinkering, > unless it's to clarify something which was a little muddy (gadri, > for example). Bob, I hope you read that. > The other question for me is time. I wouldn't really have the time > or inclination to write up big proposals, but I would probably > have the time to read and vote on others' proposals. If this is > enough, I suppose I'm willing. That much, at least, would be nice. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui