From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 14 10:36:54 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 26220 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 17:36:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Sep 2003 17:36:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 17:36:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19yant-0006qm-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:36:53 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19yamt-0006pW-00; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:35:51 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19yamk-0006oc-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:35:42 -0700 Received: from craig [209.42.212.114] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A6D211820028; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:35:14 -0400 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Text for beginners - chrestomathy part 1 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <8690811c.811c8690@imap.epfl.ch> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.212.114] X-archive-position: 6162 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "Craig" Reply-To: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20644 >> Basically, the Chrestomathy is not, to my knowledge, given any >> officialstatus, so it has no relationship whatsoever with the BF. >Insert rant about how it's not surprising that we have so many >unbelievably stupid official projects when members of LLG don't bother >reading the list of official projects which are up for consideration. Actually, what I meant was that it wasn't official in the sense of being a baselined document. If there had been an error in the Zelda translation and we had voted it up, I would not assume that the error was okay in the absence of BF prescription to the contrary. I was thinking "official" in terms of being an official part of the baselined language, rather than in terms of being recognized by LLG. I'm sorry for the confusion. >It was about number 20 on the list when we voted and it's rather >prominent on: >http://www.lojban.org/llg/projects.html You may recall how many things were up for voting. I do not remember all of them, nor do I expect anyone else to. I do remember the Chrestomathy, however. -- .kreig.daniyl. "Best case scenario: free ice cream for all. Worst case scenario: World War 3-27" -carbon ragnarok@pobox.com teucer@bnomic.org