From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Tue Oct 07 13:27:24 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A6yQH-0003bj-9H for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:27:09 -0700 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 341FF3A35; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:26:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: le fanmo sinxa pe la pier. Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:26:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20031007152215.94971.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20031007152215.94971.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310071626.36629.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 6374 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tuesday 07 October 2003 11:22, Jorge "Llambías" wrote: > la pier cusku di'e > > > It's an Indian word. la mo'andas. du la ma'atman. > > But isn't Mahatma a title, like Dalai Lama? If we > don't say {la lord} or {la doktor}, we shouldn't really > say {la ma'atman}. Both {ma'atma} and {mo'anda} are > valid fu'ivla. If there is more than one Mahatma, or there's an office of Mahatma distinct from Mohandas who occupied it, and even if there isn't, we can say {lo me la ma'atman}. That's a type-2 fu'ivla. phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.