From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Oct 31 10:47:24 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 15671 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2003 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Oct 2003 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2003 18:47:21 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AFeIq-0005Ft-Jq for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:47:20 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AFeI7-0005Eq-Kt; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:46:35 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AFeHo-0005De-T4 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:46:16 -0800 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:46:16 -0800 Subject: [lojban] Re: two concepts I haven't found any helpful translation Message-ID: <20031031184616.GG26692@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20031031031236.GA75669@allusion.net> <20031031094557.G87252-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031031094557.G87252-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6530 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21011 On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 09:51:09AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > Anyway `samselpla' is by far the best lujvo yet proposed for > > this. `sampruce' is, however, acceptable. > > On the basis of your fiat? Given that I've never seen anyone agree with you on lujvo design, regardless of how good you are at speaking the language (and you are quite good), I'd say his fiat wins over yours. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui