From sentto-44114-21124-1068491728-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Mon Nov 10 11:15:32 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:15:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.104]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AJHVV-0005xt-Ur for lojban-in@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:15:25 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-21124-1068491728-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 19:15:28 -0000 X-Sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 12389 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.88) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.184] by n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 19:14:37 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "hfroark" X-Originating-IP: 66.218.66.88 X-Yahoo-Profile: hfroark MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:14:36 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: Difference in gismu and rafsi lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 6621 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, "hfroark" wrote: > --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0000, hfroark wrote: > >> Can I assume that the cmavo "zi'o" has the rafsi "zil"? > > > >Yes. The rafsi list has only gismu rafsi, IIRC. > > No, it has pairs such as "biv" -> "bi", "dav" -> "da", "doi" - > "do". > Also, I processed them both with perl as preparation for a > programming project I am working on. The difference just described > was > the only difference in the rafsi to gismu mapping. I just saw xorxes's message. It seems a reasonable explaination. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/