From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu Nov 13 17:58:19 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AKTDw-0000i8-Rh for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:58:13 -0800 Received: from granite.thestonecutters.net (localhost.thestonecutters.net [127.0.0.1]) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAE1rioM014558 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id hAE1riT1014555 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) X-Authentication-Warning: granite.thestonecutters.net: xod owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:53:44 -0500 (EST) From: Invent Yourself To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: COI, UI (was Re: cfari) In-Reply-To: <20031114014425.GN15718@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20031113204537.X13773-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 6664 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:50:06PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > > coi itself is the *only* word I've seen get used properly in COI > > > that I can recall. > > > > This may be true, but it's certainly not an argument for nuking > > COI in favor of UI. > > Granted. But the contents of COI could be pared down, certainly. ko'a goi lo cmavo be zo coi be'o poi cfipu lo certu zo'u li'a le pu'u ko'a po'o binxo cu seljijnu nuncikre -- DR. EDDIE: (defensive) They were performance pieces. ANDERTON: You set your patients on fire! DR. EDDIE: And put them out. Some not as quickly as others, but let's change the subject, shall we?