From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Nov 12 15:24:17 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 26453 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2003 23:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Nov 2003 23:24:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2003 23:24:14 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AK4JU-0008CE-Hb for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:22:16 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AK4Iy-0008BA-S3; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:21:44 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:21:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu ([18.7.21.83]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AK4Ij-0008At-Lj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:21:29 -0800 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id hACNNM9Q001935 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:23:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id hACNNMbr022953 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from torg.mit.edu (TORG.MIT.EDU [18.208.0.57]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id hACNNL4e029748 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:23:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AK4KP-00083p-00 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:23:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:23:13 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: {Archivist} niltei? Message-ID: <20031112232313.GB30931@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20031112224720.GI4805@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031112224720.GI4805@digitalkingdom.org> X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6633 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-From: Rob Speer From: Rob Speer Reply-To: rspeer@MIT.EDU X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21114 On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:47:20PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > In the definition for temci, it says: > > [also age/elapsed time (= niltei)]; > > What is the place structure of niltei, and how does one use it? niltei seems pretty ill-conceived. It would seem to be the amount that something is a time interval, while temci already is an interval of time. -- mu'o mi'e rab.spir