From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Nov 03 05:41:23 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 13012 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 13:41:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Nov 2003 13:41:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2003 13:41:19 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AGexK-0006qr-ND for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:41:18 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AGewr-0006oj-Gz; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:40:49 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman2.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.188] helo=postman.arcor.de) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AGewa-0006oW-IP for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 05:40:32 -0800 Received: from hamwpne1 ([212.13.198.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA3DeSgj012321 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:40:29 +0100 (MET) Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:40:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: Implied sumti ordering Message-ID: <3FA668D6.11529.DB7D45@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 6542 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-From: "Philip Newton" From: "Philip Newton" Reply-To: pnewton@gmx.de X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21023 On 3 Nov 2003 at 13:14, Mr Ekted wrote: > I realize there are other ways to say this like: > > mi citka le rectu > fe le rectu cu citka fa mi > le rectu se citka mi The third should be {le rectu cu se citka mi}, otherwise you simply have two sumti, {le rectu se citka} and {mi}, and no selbri. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.