From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Nov 14 11:02:33 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 80251 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2003 19:02:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2003 19:02:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2003 19:02:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AKjCV-0007ZA-Fw for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:01:47 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AKjBw-0007YH-5V; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:01:12 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AKjBh-0005r3-6E for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:00:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20031114190106.23490.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:01:06 PST Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:01:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: [lojban] Re: COI, UI (was Re: cfari) In-Reply-To: <20031114184304.GT15718@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 6676 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21157 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:37:17AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > I don't see numbers containing letters or lerfu strings with > > numbers used much or at all. It would be better to have to add > > glue for those rather than forcing boi in the above situations. > > It's going to get used a lot in math, very likely. I don't think that convenience in a hypothetical math usage should trump convenience in everyday usage. Still, strings with numbers would remain easy: {uburebu} instead of {ubure} for U2, and there is no arbitrary restriction to the number being in first position: {cibumy} for 3M. Numbers with letters as digits would not be so straightforward, but what would they be used for? The usual talk of using letters for the units of dimensioned numbers is nonsense because units don't work like that in Lojban. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree