From phma@webjockey.net Wed Nov 12 20:30:26 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 34709 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 04:30:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Nov 2003 04:30:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 04:30:25 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 22E9E4DFB; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Question about lujvo-making Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:30:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311122330.23419.phma@webjockey.net> From: Pierre Abbat X-Originating-IP: 208.150.110.21 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21121 On Wednesday 12 November 2003 19:14, hfroark wrote: > I'm having trouble making sense of rule 5 in the lujvo-making > algorithm in > http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter4.html#s11 > > It says to test all forms with the pattern "CVC ... CVC + X". To be > perfectly clear does this mean that all the rafsi in the "..." > portion must be CVC forms? Yes. What's going on is, a word of the form CVCCVCCVCCVCX may be lexed as CV CCVCCVCCVCX. If the word is of the form CVCCVCCCVCVCX, removing CV yields CCVCCCVCVCX, which is not a lujvo and is therefore a slinku'i; if it is of the form CVCCVCCVVCVCX, removing CV yields CCVCCVVCVCX, which is likewise a slinku'i. > The second part says that: 'X must either be a CVCCV long rafsi that > happens to have a permissible initial pair as the consonant cluster, > or is something which has caused a "y"-hyphen to be installed between > the previous CVC and itself by one of the above rules'. If X is not > one of those does that mean the test terminates with no changes > needed? Yes. Examples of these are {*baklamrectu} "musk ox meat", which breaks into {ba klamrectu} "will teach about odometry", and therefore must be {bakylamrectu}, and {*ricpudyxrula} "orchard flower", which breaks into {ri cpudyxrula} (meaning undefined), and therefore must be {ricypudyxrula} (though I prefer {ricpurdyxrula}). {baklanme} (which is a translation of the genus name Ovibos) does not need a 'y' inserted because {nme} is not a possible rafsi. > The 5c says: 'Install a "y"-hyphen at the first such joint'. Is that > the the first from right-to-left or left-to-right? If it is the > right-to-left then what is done if the first such joint is between > the X portion and it's immediately preceding CVC and a "y"-hyphen is > already at that joint? It is inserted at the leftmost joint. phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman.