From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Nov 29 14:51:17 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 97043 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2003 22:51:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Nov 2003 22:51:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2003 22:51:17 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AQDvo-0001zt-Eu for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:51:16 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AQDvE-0001tY-U9; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:50:40 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.27] helo=mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AQDv0-0001t5-Ks for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:50:26 -0800 Received: from [81.48.151.158] (ASt-Lambert-106-1-2-158.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.48.151.158]) by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 117EB38000E3 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:49:55 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: <20031119231250.4866.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20031119231250.4866.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <58732EBE-22BE-11D8-BC61-003065E00134@desquilbet.org> Subject: [lojban] Sir (was: "Tintin - L'Ile Noire" in Lojban) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 23:49:53 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) X-archive-position: 6810 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jerome@desquilbet.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Desquilbet?= From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Desquilbet?= Reply-To: jerome@desquilbet.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21291 >> 6. >> le barpre: ti vanci sanmi doi do'u > > What's a good vocative for "Sir"? {doi prenu}? {doi nobli}? {doi do > io}? > {doi do ga'inai}? Is {doi do'u} better than {doi do}? I think using {.io} is a very good idea. What about {doi.iodo}?