From hfroark@bigmailbox.net Mon Nov 10 10:31:17 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 56120 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 18:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.90) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:13 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.122] by n6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 18:31:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:31:08 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Difference in gismu and rafsi lists Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20031110180636.GC4521@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 794 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "hfroark" X-Originating-IP: 66.218.66.90 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=81005150 X-Yahoo-Profile: hfroark X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21101 --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0000, hfroark wrote: >> In the document >> http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/gismu.txt , the cmavo >> "zi'o" is listed with rafsi "zil". In the document >> http://www.lojban.org/publications/wordlists/rafsi.txt , neither >> the >> rafsi "zil" nor the cmavo "zi'o" is listed at all. >> >> Can I assume that the cmavo "zi'o" has the rafsi "zil"? > >Yes. The rafsi list has only gismu rafsi, IIRC. No, it has pairs such as "biv" -> "bi", "dav" -> "da", "doi" -> "do". Also, I processed them both with perl as preparation for a programming project I am working on. The difference just described was the only difference in the rafsi to gismu mapping.