From hfroark@bigmailbox.net Mon Nov 10 11:15:28 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: hfroark@bigmailbox.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 12389 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.88) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 19:15:27 -0000 Received: from [66.218.67.184] by n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Nov 2003 19:14:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:14:36 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Difference in gismu and rafsi lists Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 668 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "hfroark" X-Originating-IP: 66.218.66.88 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=81005150 X-Yahoo-Profile: hfroark X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21102 --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, "hfroark" wrote: > --- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:03:52PM -0000, hfroark wrote: > >> Can I assume that the cmavo "zi'o" has the rafsi "zil"? > > > >Yes. The rafsi list has only gismu rafsi, IIRC. > > No, it has pairs such as "biv" -> "bi", "dav" -> "da", "doi" - > "do". > Also, I processed them both with perl as preparation for a > programming project I am working on. The difference just described > was > the only difference in the rafsi to gismu mapping. I just saw xorxes's message. It seems a reasonable explaination.