From jexom@free.fr Mon Dec 15 03:21:59 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr ([213.228.0.44])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 1AVqnR-0004LJ-NE
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:21:53 -0800
Received: from imp4-a.free.fr (imp4-a.free.fr [213.228.0.86])
	by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44EDC4351
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:21:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by imp4-a.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id C1FE62038; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:21:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: from ext-138012.rational.com (ext-138012.rational.com [130.213.138.12]) 
	by imp4-a.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP 
	for <jexom@imap.free.fr>; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:21:51 +0100
Message-ID: <1071487311.3fdd994fb3ee8@imp4-a.free.fr>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:21:51 +0100
From: "jexOm." <jexom@free.fr>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: article review
References: <3FDDA20A.8058.4D5631@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <3FDDA20A.8058.4D5631@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-archive-position: 6879
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jexom@free.fr
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Selon Philip Newton <pnewton@gmx.de>:

> On 15 Dec 2003 at 11:14, jexOm. wrote:
> 
> > coi rodo
> > 
> > The article at
> >     http://jerome.desquilbet.org/lojban/rattle/ 
> > will be edited and adapted for the e-zine
> >     http://www.therationaledge.com/
> > I.e. this "internal" article in my company will become visible.
> > So, please, let me know if you have comments, so as I can fix and make the
> > article better so as to have it serve the Lojban community as best as
> possible.
> 
> I'm curious why you use JPEG graphics? The images in your article all 
> have very few colours and large areas of single colour, which would 
> make a format such as GIF or PNG better, in my opinion. JPEG is better 
> at continuous-tone graphics such as scanned images or photos, where 
> there are many colours and no areas of exactly the same shade of 
> colour.
> 
> Philip

Looks like the RationalEdge articles usually contain gif images.
I'll optimize that for my own copy of the article.
Thank you for your suggestion,
  Jérôme.