From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Dec 19 10:26:44 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 13603 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2003 18:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2003 18:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2003 18:26:43 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AXPKj-0001dh-80 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:26:41 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AXPKC-0001cp-PJ; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:26:08 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AXPJy-0001ca-6G for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:25:54 -0800 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:25:54 -0800 Message-ID: <20031219182554.GQ32076@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 6891 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: web page X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21373 On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 08:09:16AM -0500, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > In a message dated 2003-12-19 3:48:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, > lojban@yahoogroups.com writes: > > > > mi tolcinri badri nixli gi'e sisku lo nanmu poi djica le nu > > penmi gi'e se zdile gasnu .i mi ponse le pixra be mi vecu'u le > > mi samxruebe pagbu .i ko mrilu fi mi ja'e le nu mi'o penmi ca > > zo'e > > robin, is "pagbu" ('part') used for 'page' in this way? i don't > remember the outcome of the discussion some months back out web > pages, but "pagbu" seems inappropriate. It is what I consistently use, because papri is clearly wrong and a web page is, definitionally, a part of the web. How is it inappropriate, exactly? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui