From phma@webjockey.net Mon Dec 01 16:16:18 2003
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 35096 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 00:16:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2003 00:16:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 00:16:17 -0000
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 20839AB95; Tue,  2 Dec 2003 00:16:11 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: fu'ivla rafsi and r-hyphens
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:16:09 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20031201224832.50843.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031201224832.50843.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200312011916.09435.phma@webjockey.net>
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 208.150.110.21
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21319

On Monday 01 December 2003 17:48, Jorge "Llamb=EDas" wrote:
> > In my proposal, a rafsi that immediately precedes a fu'ivla rafsi must
> > end in
> >
> > a consonant, so if you want to use a cmavo with no CVC rafsi, you have =
to
> > use {zei}. I hadn't thought of {ba'oryglauka}; if it works, and all cma=
vo
> > that have rafsi have a CVV or CVC rafsi, it would be a way to make lujv=
o
> > with them. (I'll check later. I have an errand to run.)
>
> "dza" and "jve" appear to be the only CCV rafsi for cmavo, and both
> have other forms, namely "dav" and "jev".
>
> We need an additional rule: when a rafsi fu'ivla is preceded by a CVV
> rafsi, this rafsi will sometimes have to be y-separated from its
> preceding rafsi, if any. For example: {bardyba'oryglauka} for the
> lujvo formed from {barda-banro-glauka}. {braba'oryglauka} is a lujvo
> formed from two fu'ivla {braba'orV} and {glauka}, not from {braba'o}
> and {glauka}.
>
> The "sometimes" needs to be worked out in more detail.

As my proposal currently stands, {ba'oryglauka} is not a word; the rafsi=20
before a fu'iva rafsi must end with a consonant, and that's how I'll write=
=20
the program. Once we have working code handling both proposals, then we can=
=20
try new rules out.

phma
--=20
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.