From OneOfThree@gmx.net Sat Jan 10 02:11:10 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: OneOfThree@gmx.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 84463 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2004 10:11:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2004 10:11:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 10:11:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 2676 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Jan 2004 10:11:08 -0000 Received: from p5086C893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ONEOF) (80.134.200.147) by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 11:11:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3159272 Message-ID: <000e01c3d734$860ee460$fe7aa8c0@ONEOF> To: References: <1073712975.170.77527.m12@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 05:43:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 213.165.64.20 From: "Stefan \"1of3\" Koch" Subject: Re: On not using du for is X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=39088451 X-Yahoo-Profile: oneofthree2 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21423 Hi. la rork. pu cusku di'e: > Now my question is how would I best express "ti du le mamta pe mi" > without the "du"? You might use: ti poi mamta cu srana mi There is a little difference, but in cases where this expression is possible it seems more lojbanic to me. mu'omi'e ctefan.