From cowan@ccil.org Fri Jan 23 22:37:26 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 26634 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2004 06:37:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Jan 2004 06:37:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 06:37:25 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AkHMX-0002AA-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:33:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:33:45 -0500 To: Pierre Abbat Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20040124063345.GE16179@mercury.ccil.org> References: <20040123221714.GG14690@skunk.reutershealth.com> <200401232313.09774.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401232313.09774.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 192.190.237.100 X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Subject: Re: [lojban] Unicode in Lojban? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=212516 X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21488 Pierre Abbat scripsit: > vencupilno ki'a? It is a valid type-4, but unlike {mantofasma} doesn't have an > obvious ve fu'ivla or meaning. It looks like two gismu stuck together, but > {vencu} doesn't mean anything and is probably a typo for {vecnu}. It could > also be a lujvo with a letter missing. Google draws a blank. What is it? My guess is that it's a typo for "vecnu pilno", two words. -- With techies, I've generally found John Cowan If your arguments lose the first round http://www.reutershealth.com Make it rhyme, make it scan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Then you generally can jcowan@reutershealth.com Make the same stupid point seem profound! --Jonathan Robie