From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Sat Feb 14 16:35:39 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 4094 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2004 00:35:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Feb 2004 00:35:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2004 00:35:39 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AsAG1-0002zM-U1 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:35:37 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AsAFP-0002yh-Cu; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:34:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AsAFG-0002yT-WC for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:34:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20040215003419.36021.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.80.148.94] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:34:19 PST Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 16:34:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20040214033802.GA18463@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7106 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21581 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:18:12AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > > nu'i ge mi lo nu cusku bau nu'u gi do da nelci > > > > > > Yep, that's the case where my new version has nu'u being > > > absolutely required. > > > > > > Any other cases? I couldn't find any. > > > > How about this: > > > > nu nu'i da lo broda nu'u brode kei > > That's because if you remove the kei, you're still in the nu'i when > you try to close the nu, right? Not sure what you mean. The problem is that if you remove the nu'u, you don't have an inside selbri for the nu, and so you can't close it with kei yet. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html