From slobin@slobin.ran.pp.ru Wed Feb 04 08:55:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: slobin.ran.pp.ru!slobin@slobin.ran.pp.ru X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 98693 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 16:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Feb 2004 16:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO castle.ran.pp.ru) (213.134.196.14) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 16:51:51 -0000 Received: from castle.ran.pp.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by castle.ran.pp.ru (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i14Gpede020934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:51:41 +0300 Received: from slobin.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by castle.ran.pp.ru (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with UUCP id i14GpewQ020932 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:51:40 +0300 Received: by slobin.ran.pp.ru (dMail for DOS v2.07b7, 18Jul00); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:23:37 +0300 Resent-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Resent-Message-Id: <2.07b7.V0CQ.HSKIVC@slobin.ran.pp.ru> Resent-Organization: Point of View Resent-From: "Cyril Slobin" Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:23:36 +0300 (MSK) Resent-X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7] To: bug@ice.ru References: <20040203201942.74601.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Message-Id: <2.07b7.LXFG.HSJ4GL@slobin.ran.pp.ru> Organization: Point of View Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:14:45 +0300 (MSK) X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7] Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 213.134.196.14 From: "Cyril Slobin" Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: How to catch a hare? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=170537354 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21517 On 3-Feb-2004 12:19 Llambías wrote: >> Yes, this is weakest part of my translation. I myself feel like there is >> something wrong with {gau}. But I cannot find any better solution. Your >> suggestion? > I would have used {tai} or {tai tu'a}. Seems good for me. Eugenis in lojban-rus suggests tetai, but meaning is basically the same, co'o mi'e kir. -- Cyril Slobin