From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 11 04:55:27 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 36077 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 12:55:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Feb 2004 12:55:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 12:55:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Aqtnc-0002lv-Jl for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:49:04 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AqtmO-0002lF-QO; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:47:48 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AqtmG-0002kk-SZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:47:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20040211124710.54041.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:47:10 PST Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:47:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20040211022931.GJ8463@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7087 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21562 --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > 15.7) mi ce'e bau la lojban. pe'e joi do ce'e bau la gliban. nu'u casnu > ( I [plus] in-language Lojban massed-with you [plus] in-language English > ) discuss. > > My version of the official parser doesn't handle pe'e or ce'e, > however it seems Amazingly Unlikely that the sentence is correct in > any sense, as it uses nu'u to terminate ce'e/pe'e, which the grammar > does not allow that I can see. The sentence is correct without nu'u. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html