From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Feb 13 19:38:54 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 49683 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2004 03:38:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Feb 2004 03:38:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2004 03:38:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Arqdo-0004os-Si for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:52 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Arqd7-0004oE-S0; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:09 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Arqd0-0004o5-7X for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:02 -0800 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20040214033802.GA18463@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040211182841.GS8463@digitalkingdom.org> <20040211194944.63834.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040211194944.63834.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7104 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Another book wierdness. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21579 On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:18:12AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > > nu'i ge mi lo nu cusku bau nu'u gi do da nelci > > > > Yep, that's the case where my new version has nu'u being > > absolutely required. > > > > Any other cases? I couldn't find any. > > How about this: > > nu nu'i da lo broda nu'u brode kei That's because if you remove the kei, you're still in the nu'i when you try to close the nu, right? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui