From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 17 15:11:33 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B3kC7-0005gh-9l for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:11:27 -0800 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:11:27 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Official parser problem? Message-ID: <20040317231127.GB11847@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040317222428.GZ11847@digitalkingdom.org> <20040317225715.74532.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317225715.74532.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7223 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:57:15PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > The official parser fails on: > > > > lo'u mi le'u si lo'u mi le'u > > I think the official parser doesn't handle {si} at all. It fails even > on {mi si}. ... That's really, umm, special. Why am I using it as a base case for my testing then? :-P Guess I'll have to test against both the official parser *and* jbofi'e. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui