From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 17 23:57:25 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:57:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B3sP2-0002xx-61 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:57:20 -0800 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:57:20 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] mimiklama Message-ID: <20040318075720.GZ11847@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 7253 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list jbofi'e successfully parses "mimiklama" as "mi mi klama". I'm guessing that that's not *really* OK; any opinions? Is it reasonable to have a rule that says that a cmavo can be followed by spaces, another cmavo, or a consonant cluster? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui