From sentto-44114-21761-1079633372-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Thu Mar 18 10:10:11 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from n14.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.69]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B41y1-0002UD-On for lojban-in@lojban.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:10:05 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-21761-1079633372-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.201] by n14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Mar 2004 18:09:35 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 28535 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 18:09:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Mar 2004 18:09:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 18:09:33 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D566F4B9B; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20040318075720.GZ11847@digitalkingdom.org> <40598020.18166.14409A@localhost> <20040318174017.GD11847@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20040318174017.GD11847@digitalkingdom.org> Message-Id: <200403181309.30712.phma@webjockey.net> X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 208.150.110.21 From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:09:30 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: mimiklama Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 7264 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thursday 18 March 2004 12:40, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > OK, what about 'mimibilga'? Obviously 'mimibIlga' is handleable, but > without the stress indicated? It's the lack of stress indicators that > I'm really asking about. In valfendi, if the stress is not indicated in a piece that contains a brivla and the -s option is specified, it is assumed to be on the syllable before the last, skipping syllables with 'y' in them. > I guess what I'm asking is "in absence of stress indicators, does > tosmabru still happen?". What about "miklamami"? "miklamami" lexes as "mi klamami", with an unknown fu'ivla *klamami. Likewise in jbofihe. phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/