From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu Mar 25 04:34:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:34:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B6U3z-000402-DJ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:34:23 -0800 Message-ID: <20040325123351.37235.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:33:51 PST Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:33:51 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: grammar oddity challenge To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 7319 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Craig wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:00:04PM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > >It is a brivla at least in parser terms: > >"a. Token sequences of the form any - (ZEI - any) ..., where > >there may be any number of ZEIs, are merged into a single token > >of selma'o BRIVLA." > > But selma'o BRIVLA only exists in the mind of the parser. It certainly isn't > a real group of cmavo - in fact, the terms "brivla" and "cmavo" are mutually > exclusive, IIRC. Well, {da zei da} is certainly not one cmavo but three. On the other hand {go'i} is both a brivla and a cmavo. At least that's how I would understand it. What would you call a token of selma'o BRIVLA? mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html