From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Mar 28 18:05:06 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 98365 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 02:04:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Mar 2004 02:04:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 02:04:57 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7m8g-0001t7-FO for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:04:34 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7m80-0001sJ-7W; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:03:52 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7m7q-0001rx-1L for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:03:42 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:03:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20040329020342.GK6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040328085608.GO18619@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329013844.GB18719@ccil.org> <20040329014336.GI6569@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329014924.GE18719@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040329014924.GE18719@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7382 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Official Parser confused about pe'e and ce'e X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21856 On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 08:49:24PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > > > Even in the latter case, I still would *very* much appreciate > > guidance for things like "le broda .ije broda". > > Okay. IMHO, ijeks/ijoiks aren't appropriate between a full bridi like > "broda" and a fragment like "le broda". "le broda" doesn't assert > anything, so logically or non-logically combining it with an actual > claim makes little sense. OK. Is that also what the techfixes and such say should be the case? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui