From phma@webjockey.net Thu Mar 25 18:37:12 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 78861 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 02:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Mar 2004 02:37:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 02:37:08 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF60A2E7; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:37:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403252137.07640.phma@webjockey.net> X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 208.150.110.21 From: Pierre Abbat Subject: Re: [lojban] Messed up zi'o usage (Re:lanzu usage) X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21814 On Thursday 25 March 2004 18:42, la_okus wrote: > --- Pierre Abbat wrote: > > "lo ponjo cu te lanzu fi le'e lanzu fe so'i dzena". > BTW what's up with your second example? lo ponjo and le'e > lanzu are both in x3... No they're not. "lo ponjo" is in x1 of "te lanzu", which is x3 of "lanzu". "le'e lanzu" is in x3 of "te lanzu", which is x1 of "lanzu". phma -- li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa