From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Mar 28 10:39:55 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 81342 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2004 18:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m17.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2004 18:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2004 18:39:54 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7fCK-0003C9-G3 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:39:52 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7fBe-0003Bb-PU; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:39:10 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:39:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7fBV-0003BO-H0 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:39:01 -0800 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:39:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20040328183901.GD6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20040321191809.GB32271@digitalkingdom.org> <20040321184454.GA32271@digitalkingdom.org> <20040321191809.GB32271@digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20040321190741.0333f600@pop.east.cox.net> <20040322013001.GC30473@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040322013001.GC30473@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7369 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Error in bnf.300 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21843 On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:30:01PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 07:52:40PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > At 11:54 AM 3/21/04 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >But the "I jek" has already been eaten, so the appropriate parte of > > >paragraph can't match. Oops, nowhere to go. Oh well. > > > > > >(I know this occurs because I just watched my PEG parser do it > > >several times until I changed the ordering; it's fixed now, and is > > >the only Lojban parser I'm aware of that can parse "mi broda .i je > > >bo no da zo'u broda"). > > > > It prescriptively shouldn't be able to. Under TECHFIX 45, the > > ability to put an unmarked prenex after an IJEK was specifically and > > intentionally removed. > > > > Ummm, *OK*. It's an example from the Reference Grammar. > > roda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da > > Chapter 16, example 10.5. Another one (sequentially next example, actually): su'oda zo'u mi prami da .ije naku zo'u do prami da Official parser eats that happily. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui