From cowan@ccil.org Sun Mar 28 18:17:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 3375 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 02:17:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Mar 2004 02:17:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 02:17:45 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7mJL-0007eK-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:15:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:15:35 -0500 To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20040329021535.GF18719@ccil.org> References: <20040328085608.GO18619@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329013844.GB18719@ccil.org> <20040329014336.GI6569@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329014924.GE18719@ccil.org> <20040329020342.GK6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040329020342.GK6569@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 192.190.237.100 From: John Cowan Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Official Parser confused about pe'e and ce'e X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=212516 X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21858 Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > OK. Is that also what the techfixes and such say should be the case? Deffo. From Techfix 45: (Proposed Change graf 2) Shift all the sentence fragments (the forms of utterance_20 which are not sentence_40) to a higher level; they can only be connected by I, not by any lower-level form. (Rationale graf 2) 2) Logically connecting sentence fragments never did make very much sense, but was allowed because of the lack of distinction between I and ijek. -- "Take two turkeys, one goose, four John Cowan cabbages, but no duck, and mix them http://www.ccil.org/~cowan together. After one taste, you'll duck jcowan@reutershealth.com soup the rest of your life." http://www.reutershealth.com --Groucho