From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Mar 27 02:56:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 71183 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 10:56:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2004 10:56:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 10:56:45 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7BUE-0004Na-14 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:56:22 -0800 Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7BTT-0004Mj-RO; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:55:35 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B7BTK-0004MW-4Y for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:55:26 -0800 Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:55:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20040327105526.GA18619@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-archive-position: 7356 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Further Parser Confusion X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21830 Parsing an example sentence: rlpowell@chain.digitalkingdom.org> echo "le broda .i je klama" | parser -h -t 3;0;00moi ke lojbo genturfa'i Copyright 1991,1992,1993 The Logical Languages Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved 1 la 2 cmene_404 djan 3 terms_80 1 2 4 VAU VAU 5 paragraph_10 3 4 6 I i 7 JA je 8 7 9 I_819 6 8 10 selbri_130 klama 11 tail_terms_71 VAU 12 paragraph_A_11 10 11 13 text_0 5 9 12 Space used: 5600 bytes for tokens, 100 bytes for strings Time used: 0 seconds Note lines 9, where it eats I_819. This eventually becaumes I_root_956, which as I've already pointed out *erroneously* eats ijeks. So I'm kind of stuck here: that sentence may or may not be parseable, but I don't think it is under the current grammar, because only paragraph_10 calls 'fragment', and only 'fragment' can eat "le broda" by itself as a sentence. Note that fixing the I_root_956 bug (by making /*TRY(I_root_956_2);*/ in lexrulek.c) causes this sentence to fail to parse. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui