From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Mar 30 05:53:21 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 88434 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2004 13:53:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Mar 2004 13:53:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Mar 2004 13:53:19 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B8Jfj-0007l3-IR
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:52:55 -0800
Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B8Jey-00077v-AQ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:52:08 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web41904.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.155])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B8Jen-0006dM-Ry
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:51:57 -0800
Message-ID: <20040330135126.44404.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:51:26 PST
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 05:51:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <19315a1987ed.1987ed19315a@imap.epfl.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 7401
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Subject: [lojban] Re: "pu" versus "pu ku" and LR(1)
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21875


la greg cusku di'e
> cu'u la xorxes
> > end up with {ta roroi na xagji} having to mean the same as 
> > {ta na roroi xagji}, which should be different.
> 
> what is the current state?
> 
> I presume that, at the moment, these parse as:
> 
> naku ta roroiku xagji and
> ta naku roroiku xagji
> 
> both meaning "it is not true that "that" is always hungry. 

That's probably the most official current meaning, yes.

> I think this is good. The particular semantics of na, although annoying and
> sometimes intractible can also be ummm... (no, not useful!) err...
> interesting...

What does {su'o da na broda gi'e na brode} mean?

> does ta roroi naku xagji mean "for all times, it is not true that "that" is
> hungry"?  

That's how I understand it, yes. {roroiku naku} = {naku su'oroiku},
and {su'oroiku naku} = {naku roroiku}. (Always not = not anytime,
sometime not = not always.) Having {na roroi} = {roroi na} when
directly on the selbri is very odd.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html