From cowan@ccil.org Sun Mar 28 17:51:29 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 62637 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 01:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Mar 2004 01:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 01:51:28 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7lu0-00069Z-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:49:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:49:24 -0500 To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Message-ID: <20040329014924.GE18719@ccil.org> References: <20040328085608.GO18619@digitalkingdom.org> <20040329013844.GB18719@ccil.org> <20040329014336.GI6569@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040329014336.GI6569@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 192.190.237.100 From: John Cowan Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Official Parser confused about pe'e and ce'e X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=212516 X-Yahoo-Profile: johnwcowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21854 Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > Even in the latter case, I still would *very* much appreciate guidance > for things like "le broda .ije broda". Okay. IMHO, ijeks/ijoiks aren't appropriate between a full bridi like "broda" and a fragment like "le broda". "le broda" doesn't assert anything, so logically or non-logically combining it with an actual claim makes little sense. -- "In my last lifetime, John Cowan I believed in reincarnation; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in this lifetime, jcowan@reutershealth.com I don't." --Thiagi http://www.reutershealth.com