From xeubie@hotmail.com Tue Mar 16 19:57:24 2004
Return-Path: <xeubie@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: xeubie@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 51915 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 03:57:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Mar 2004 03:57:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.66.88)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 03:57:22 -0000
Received: from [66.218.67.158] by n4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Mar 2004 03:56:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:56:32 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <c38i9g+snlp@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <c2oqj1+69ht@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 279
X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.66.88
From: "la_okus" <xeubie@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: 69.162.47.2
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?sticking_with_h_(Re:_pronouncing_=91_as_th)?=
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=170795535
X-Yahoo-Profile: la_okus
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 21694

I've decided to stick with /h/ after all. My suggestion to anybody 
considering otherwise is to reconsider, else face confused 
beginners and perhaps even confused veterans. Besides, I think 
robin was right about it sounding like I have a lisp...

mu'omi'e .okus.