From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 13 07:20:10 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 89035 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2004 14:20:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172)
  by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Apr 2004 14:20:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2004 14:20:09 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BDOid-0007E5-7K
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:16:55 -0700
Received: from dsl081-049-134.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.49.134] helo=chain.digitalkingdom.org)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BDOhj-0007DC-Ag; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:15:59 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1BDOhZ-0007Cr-4X
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:15:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20040413141518.79724.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:15:18 PDT
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200404130052.36300.phma@webjockey.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 7536
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Subject: [lojban] Re: Scope of ko
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 22010


--- Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 April 2004 00:34, Rob Speer wrote:
> >
> > As an example of where the scope of ko really matters, compare these two
> > sentences:
> >
> > 1. Don't sleep with her just because you want to.
> > 2. Don't sleep with her, because you'll catch an STD.
> 
> 1. ko na gletu ko'a mu'ipo'o lenu do djica
> 2. ko gletu ko'a, mu'i lonu do cinbi'abi'o da'i kei, naku

I agree with 1., but not with 2. Moving naku around does not
really change much here because all terms are singular. 
To get the intended meaning of 2 we have to put the reason
in a separate bridi. The meaning of 2 really is:

  Don't sleep with her, because [if you do, then] you'll 
  catch an STD.

So perhaps something like:

 ko na gletu ko'a imu'ibo [romu'ei lo nu ja'a go'i kei] do cinbi'abi'o 

But I agree that this is more a matter of the scope of 
{na} vs. {mu'i}, rahter than the scope of {ko}. We have:

1.  DO: NOT(BECAUSE(you sleep with her,you want to))
2.  DO: BECAUSE(NOT(you sleep with her),you avoid catching an STD)

In both cases the command has widest scope. This can be seen from
the corresponding indicative phrases:

1. He doesn't sleep with her just because he wants to.
2. He doesn't sleep with her, because [if he does, then] he'll catch an STD.

1. ko'e na gletu ko'a mu'i po'o lo nu ko'e djica
2. ko'e na gletu ko'a imu'ibo [romu'ei lo nu ja'a go'i kei] ko'e cinbi'abi'o
 
mu'o mi'e xorxes




	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/